Quick Find
Energy Experts
- All users
- Laurence Jones
- Adrian Wright
- Linn Rafferty
- Simon Forsyth
- Tim Pullen
- Howard Johns
- Hugo House
- John Martin
- Matthew Rhodes
- John Barker-Brown
- John Lightfoot
- Barry Nutley
- Chris Rudge
- Gabriel Wondrausch
- Paul Hutchens
- David Hunt
- Graham Eastwick
Other Contributors
Cathy Debenham Gilly JonesGuest Bloggers
Aldous EverardChris RowlandDavid FieldsDuncan McIntoshGordon TraillJames PageJon EdgeLisa HallMatt CodyMax SillarsMike MackmurdieNick RoachRob PalgraveRoger CroftSimon FixterStewart BoyleArchive
Posting rulesRecent Comments
- I am totally confused by the 3.1p additional payment for the electricity I …
comment by SueR
- thushar - I read on Chris's website that they only charge £50 for a 1kw im…
comment by grant
- I agree that this is unfair on the customer and should be highlighted. …
comment by pure-solar-ltd-t-a-pure-renewables-hu16-5pp
Tag Cloud
YouGen Blog
Insulation is king
Posted by Tim Pullen on 13 March 2009 at 11:46 am
Let’s be clear, the greatest environmental impact of a house is from the fossil fuels it burns for its energy. No amount of eco-certified, recycled bamboo flooring can compensate for the impact of a gas guzzling house. Conserving energy, minimising the energy needs of the house has to be the first priority.
It is also the cheapest option. The payback on achieving even super-insulation levels will be in the region of four to five years. The sort of figure that solar panel manufacturers can only dream of. In short, insulation is king. But insulation is only part of the story. Draughts are also a big issue.
Air Tightness
All new houses built since April 2006 must meet a strict standard on air tightness. That is, 10 cubic metres of air per hour escaping for every square metre of the envelope surface area. This doesn’t take account of how people like to live in the building. If, like me, you enjoy opening a window and listening to the birds singing while you tap away at a keyboard, your air-tight house will not function as per specification.
Insulation – How much is too much?
The answer is, of course, it depends. Heat loss can never (in practical terms) be reduced to zero, even the best insulation can only slow it down. How close you want to get to zero is the issue.
To give an example: building regs call for a minimum 270mm mineral wool insulation in the loft in new build. That equates to a U-value (measure of heat loss) of 0.16W/m² (watts of energy lost through a square meter of roof). Increasing the thickness to 450mm will reduce the U-value to 0.08W/m². The extra cost might be an extra £5 or £6 per sq metre. But increasing to 600mm will only reduce the U-value to 0.06W/m² - there is a law of diminishing returns.
The Answer
There is a balance between insulation and air-tightness. It is broadly true that the more air passing through the house, the less effective the insulation becomes. The ultimate air tightness is the PassivHaus standard which calls for air tightness of 1m³/h and needs mechanical ventilation. At that level super-insulation is very effective and no active heating system is needed.
However, achieving an air-tight house is difficult, and potentially very expensive. The answer is to put in as much insulation as you reasonably can and accept that life is not perfect.
About the author: Tim Pullen is eco-editor for Homebuilding & Renovating magazine, author of Simply Sustainable Homes and founder of sustainable property consultancy WeatherWorks.
If you have a question about anything in the above blog, please ask it in the comments section below.
Comments
0 comments - read them below or add one
No Comments.
Leave a comment
You must log in to make a comment. If you haven't already registered, please sign up as a company or an individual, then come back and have your say.
Follow us on Twitter
RT @dave_sowden: briefing on the new Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change Ed Davey http://t.co/q1qSyk04 > so we wait & see... yesterday
RT @NormanEnviro: Tales of solar woe; the FiT from Oct 2011 to now - http://t.co/JkENAIyX yesterday
Landlords to be forced to improve energy efficiency http://t.co/KJ0lFsIT via @nickduxbury yesterday



