Energy Experts
- All users
- Gordon Traill
- Mike Mackmurdie
- Linn Raffety
- Tim Pullen
- Good Energy team
- John Martin
- Matthew Rhodes
- John Barker-Brown
- Rick Beament
- Barry Nutley
- Chris Rudge
- Gabriel Wondrausch
- Paul Hutchens
- Graham Eastwick
Other Contributors
Cathy Debenham Gilly JonesArchive
Posting rulesRecent Comments
- Hi I'd recommend that you measure the wind before you install, rat…
comment by Cathy Debenham
- Hmm - interesting. Some of the energy companies seem able to pay, and other…
comment by Cathy Debenham
- Hi As sashton says, you won't use all the electricity you generate in th…
comment by Cathy Debenham
Tag Cloud
YouGen Blog
Windows: single, double or triple glazing
Posted by Tim Pullen on 3 June 2009 at 10:07 am
If you are thinking about changing your windows you will need to think about U-values. A U-value measures of the rate at which heat escapes through a fabric, so the lower the figure, the better. A U-value of zero means that no heat is escaping. It is expressed as Watts per square metre (W/m2) but it is really only the number that matters.
A few basics. Building Regulations Part L(1A) state that windows must have a U-value of no more than 1.8W/m2, compared to walls that must have no more than 0.3W/m2. The very best triple glazed windows might achieve a U-value of 0.6W/m2. So despite anything the double-glazing salesman might say, the windows will always be a weak point in your insulation.
But to put things in context, a single-glazed window will have a U-value of 5.0W/m2, double-glazed will be between 2.2 and 1.2W/m2 and triple-glazed 1.0 to 0.6W/m2.
So replacing a single-glazed window with a reasonable quality double-glazed units will more than halve the heat loss. But bear in mind that only about 10 per cent of the total heat loss from the house will be through the windows. There is really no point in putting expensive double-glazed windows in uninsulated walls.
In a new build, installing double glazed windows is a must, but there is little point in triple-glazing unless you have super-insulated the rest of the house. Triple-glazing will cost about 20 per cent more than double-glazing and reduce the overall heat loss by about 5 per cent.
Upgrading single-glazed windows is always a good idea but you might want to think about secondary double-glazing. It is not as efficient as primary double-glazing – U-value will be about 2.8 to 3.0W/m2 – but it will cost seriously less than replacement windows. And if your frames are in good shape why throw them away?
photo by elNico
About the author: Tim Pullen is eco-editor for Homebuilding & Renovating magazine, author of Simply Sustainable Homes and founder of sustainable property consultancy WeatherWorks.
Click here to ask an Energy Expert a question, and sign up to RSS feeds, to make sure you don't miss the answer.
Comments
2 comments - read them below or add one
The U-value quoted is for a single pane of 4mm glass as secondary glazing. To work out the U-value of a sealed, double-glazed unit as secondary double glazing would needs some software and I would suggest you download Build Desk. It is free and fairly simple to use - although I must confess I have never tried the calculation you ask about.
As a guess. The sealed unit your are considering will probably have a U-value in the order of 1.8 to 2.2. Using it as secondary glazing will a significant impact. If the original window is a draughty U-value of 5, this could easily get it around 1.0
vimokshadakaComment left on: 14 September 2009 at 1:42 am
Does your figure of 2.8 - 3.0 w/m2 relate to the adding of one pane or a sealed unit? How does one work out the U-value of adding a sealed unit as secondary galzing, say with a 100mm drafty gap then a 16mm sealed gap?
Leave a comment
You must log in to make a comment. If you haven't already registered, please sign up as a company or an individual, then come back and have your say.
Quick Find
Advanced FindPromote your business
Make it easy for customers to find you (and recommend your work). It’s free!
Add your company



Tim Pullen from Weather WorksComment left on: 25 September 2009 at 1:51 pm