Quick Find
Energy Experts
- All users
- Laurence Jones
- Adrian Wright
- Linn Rafferty
- Simon Forsyth
- Tim Pullen
- Howard Johns
- Hugo House
- John Martin
- Matthew Rhodes
- John Barker-Brown
- John Lightfoot
- Barry Nutley
- Chris Rudge
- Gabriel Wondrausch
- Paul Hutchens
- David Hunt
- Graham Eastwick
Other Contributors
Cathy Debenham Gilly JonesGuest Bloggers
Aldous EverardChris RowlandDavid FieldsDuncan McIntoshGordon TraillJames PageJon EdgeLisa HallMatt CodyMax SillarsMike MackmurdieNick RoachRob PalgraveRoger CroftSimon FixterStewart BoyleArchive
Posting rulesRecent Comments
- As installers we were all warned investigations and prosecutions of both in…
comment by rudge-renewables-ex12-4aa
- Hi Paul Sorry for the delay responding. You don't have to use the energy…
comment by Cathy Debenham
- Hello Chris, I have a question about heating water by solar power to r…
comment by Dave Thickett
Tag Cloud
YouGen Blog
Rainwater tank: underground or overground?
Posted by Barry Nutley on 29 June 2009 at 9:26 am
In rainwater harvesting retrofit projects, the cost of installing a kit underground can seriously impact the financial viability, and ultimately put people off the idea. Below are some considerations to help you make the right decision:
1) Pros for underground:
a). No unsightly equipment in the garden, especially if you are installing a tank bigger than, say 300 litres or so.
b). It's suitable for a small garden or where the space is otherwise restricted. c). Less risk of "brackishness" (this is discoloration due to bacterial action at 12 degrees C and above) in summer due to warming of the leaf debris at the bottom of the tank. This problem could be reduced by thinking about location (a shaded north facing area, perhaps), and considering some form of natural shading (such as a plant).
d) Negligible risk of frost damage to tank, piping and pumps in winter. This may not be a problem depending on where you live.
2) Pros for above ground:
a). Easy to install and lower installation costs.
b). Easier to maintain in case of change of scenario or pump failure.
c). Suitable for commercial and other installations where the visual and aesthetic criteria are less important. Of course it is possible to provide a suitable, natural "cover".
In summary, there is realistically only one rule. For a full domestic system, then bury it underground (unless you want your "whites" to go brown). But, if you don't mind a bit of discolouration in your toilet, with a suitably sized/positioned system, it is feasible to have an above ground system providing a "semi" domestic system. So don't necessarily dismiss the idea if you don't want to dig up your garden.
Happy harvesting.
Photo by Mooganic
About the author: Barry Nutley is co-founder and director of Viridis Energie Consultants
About the author: Barry Nutley is co-founder and director of Viridis Energie Consultants
If you have a question about anything in the above blog, please ask it in the comments section below.
Comments
0 comments - read them below or add one
No Comments.
Leave a comment
You must log in to make a comment. If you haven't already registered, please sign up as a company or an individual, then come back and have your say.
Follow us on Twitter
A big day for the renewables industry tomorrow. Still hopeful that the proposals will be good. 9 hours ago
@websitesahoy It is there, I saw it. 10 hours ago
This map shows all the great community energy projects that have just got LEAF funding http://t.co/zXOD0FVN 12 hours ago



