Quick Find
Energy Experts
- All users
- Laurence Jones
- Adrian Wright
- Linn Rafferty
- Simon Forsyth
- Tim Pullen
- Howard Johns
- Hugo House
- John Martin
- Matthew Rhodes
- John Barker-Brown
- John Lightfoot
- Barry Nutley
- Chris Rudge
- Gabriel Wondrausch
- Paul Hutchens
- David Hunt
- Graham Eastwick
Other Contributors
Cathy Debenham Gilly JonesGuest Bloggers
Aldous EverardChris RowlandDavid FieldsDuncan McIntoshGordon TraillJames PageJon EdgeLisa HallMatt CodyMax SillarsMike MackmurdieNick RoachRob PalgraveRoger CroftSimon FixterStewart BoyleArchive
Posting rulesRecent Comments
- I would anticipate FiT fast scale reduction over the next 12 months will fa…
comment by rudge-renewables-ex12-4aa
- Hi Fred. This blog is just about the short term, based on the response to t…
comment by Cathy Debenham
- 9p or 4.7p ?????…
comment by Fred1
Tag Cloud
YouGen Blog
Will feed in tariffs change the market?
Posted by Matthew Rhodes on 7 August 2009 at 9:03 am
The announcement by the Government last month of proposed feed-in tariffs (FiTs) for renewables from next April marks a fundamental change in the way small scale renewables are incentivised in the UK, and is long overdue.
There is no question that feed-in tariffs are the right mechanism to use. They have been applied successfully in other countries – most notably Germany – for many years and are well-proven, with predictable effects.
The principle is simple: owners of microgeneration will be entitled to a fixed tariff per kWh of electricity generated by their system for the 25 year lifetime of the project. The tariffs will vary by technology (36.5p for small PV systems through to 12p for medium-sized hydropower schemes) and will be reduced over time (ie for projects that are installed later). But the critical point is that project owners will know with certainty at the time they commission their project what the guaranteed income stream is.
This is fair. After all, we know with equal certainty the damage that fossil fuel generation and use is doing to our environment. Feed-in tariffs are society’s way of paying the people who are prepared to act to mitigate this damage.
Feed-in tariffs will be funded by all electricity users. In simple terms the total money paid by utilities to people with renewables will be added up and then divided across all consumers. The same approach is used in other countries and tends to add around 1-3% to everybody’s energy bill. This kind of bill increase is easily eliminated by most people just by turning off lights and appliances when not needed, and should cause no pain at all.
So feed-in tariffs should change the market and should be welcomed. I can't wait for next April, when they will finally arrive.
Photo by lepiaf.geo
About the Author: Matthew Rhodes is chief executive of Encraft
About the author:
Matthew Rhodes is chief executive of Encraft
If you have a question about anything in the above blog, please ask it in the comments section below.
Comments
0 comments - read them below or add one
No Comments.
Leave a comment
You must log in to make a comment. If you haven't already registered, please sign up as a company or an individual, then come back and have your say.
Follow us on Twitter
RT @carolinelucas: RT @wwwfoecouk: End energy profiteering: The rich get richer, the poor get colder | Independent: http://t.co/5GOTFMSh 3 hours ago
@treadinglightly They could have made the point about insulating now much more strongly #itvtonight 3 hours ago
@ploughcroft Oh that explains some of the misinformation #itvtonight - you'd think they'd edit in things like FIT rates 3 hours ago



