Quick Find
Energy Experts
- All users
- Laurence Jones
- Adrian Wright
- Linn Rafferty
- Simon Forsyth
- Tim Pullen
- Howard Johns
- Hugo House
- John Martin
- Matthew Rhodes
- John Barker-Brown
- John Lightfoot
- Barry Nutley
- Chris Rudge
- Gabriel Wondrausch
- Paul Hutchens
- David Hunt
- Graham Eastwick
Other Contributors
Cathy Debenham Gilly JonesGuest Bloggers
Aldous EverardChris RowlandDavid FieldsDuncan McIntoshGordon TraillJames PageJon EdgeLisa HallMatt CodyMax SillarsMike MackmurdieNick RoachRob PalgraveRoger CroftSimon FixterStewart BoyleArchive
Posting rulesRecent Comments
- As installers we were all warned investigations and prosecutions of both in…
comment by rudge-renewables-ex12-4aa
- Hi Paul Sorry for the delay responding. You don't have to use the energy…
comment by Cathy Debenham
- Hello Chris, I have a question about heating water by solar power to r…
comment by Dave Thickett
Tag Cloud
YouGen Blog
Low carbon UK is well down the pecking order
Posted by Cathy Debenham on 17 September 2009 at 11:35 am
How much does the government really care about shifting the UK to a low carbon economy? Not a lot is the only conclusion I can come to from its spending figures.
Yesterday's Guardian published a wonderfully simple, easy to read, chart called the definitive atlas of UK government spending, created by economics editor Larry Elliott. It shows, department by department, where the £620.685 billion the government spends on our behalf goes.
At DECC (the department of Energy and Climate Change) the majority of its £2.1bn budget is spent on nuclear decommissioning (£1.7bn). In contrast, £0.7bn is allocated to low-carbon Britain; £0.08bn to clean energy; and £0.008bn to the international deal on climate change. Over at Defra (the department for environment, food and rural affairs) there's another £0.02bn allocated to climate change.
So, we're spending more than twice as much decommissioning a so-called clean energy source, than we are in developing a response to the twin threats of climate change and energy insecurity. Interesting...
It's not that long since we heard a lot of talk about a green new deal which would help us out of the triple crisis we found ourselves in: financial meltdown; accelerating climate change; and peak oil production leading to rising oil prices.
So let's compare the spending on the climate and energy side of things with what the government has spent on the financial bail out:
Recapitalising RBS & Lloyds £36.9bn
Financial services compensation scheme £21bn
Northern Rock £18.8bn
Bradford & Bingley £10.4bn
Dunfermline debt £1.6bn
Icesave debt £0.8bn
Kaupthing statutory debt £0.6bn
Leading to a staggering total spending on financial stability of £85.5bn
OK, a major crisis leads to monopoly-money spending. But let's learn from that, and invest now to stave off a similar crisis down the line fuelled (if that's the right word) by our inability to take climate change and peak oil seriously. We still have time to invest in decarbonising our economy, but is it afforded the priority in needs amid all the current clamour for cuts?
Thank you to Larry Elliott for making the spending picture so accessible.
Photo by austinevan
If you have a question about anything in the above blog, please ask it in the comments section below.
Comments
0 comments - read them below or add one
No Comments.
Leave a comment
You must log in to make a comment. If you haven't already registered, please sign up as a company or an individual, then come back and have your say.
Follow us on Twitter
A big day for the renewables industry tomorrow. Still hopeful that the proposals will be good. 9 hours ago
@websitesahoy It is there, I saw it. 10 hours ago
This map shows all the great community energy projects that have just got LEAF funding http://t.co/zXOD0FVN 11 hours ago



