Quick Find
Energy Experts
- All users
- Laurence Jones
- Adrian Wright
- Linn Rafferty
- Simon Forsyth
- Tim Pullen
- Howard Johns
- Hugo House
- John Martin
- Matthew Rhodes
- John Barker-Brown
- John Lightfoot
- Barry Nutley
- Chris Rudge
- Gabriel Wondrausch
- Paul Hutchens
- David Hunt
- Graham Eastwick
Other Contributors
Cathy Debenham Gilly JonesGuest Bloggers
Aldous EverardChris RowlandDavid FieldsDuncan McIntoshGordon TraillJames PageJon EdgeLisa HallMatt CodyMax SillarsMike MackmurdieNick RoachRob PalgraveRoger CroftSimon FixterStewart BoyleArchive
Posting rulesRecent Comments
- I would anticipate FiT fast scale reduction over the next 12 months will fa…
comment by rudge-renewables-ex12-4aa
- Hi Fred. This blog is just about the short term, based on the response to t…
comment by Cathy Debenham
- 9p or 4.7p ?????…
comment by Fred1
Tag Cloud
YouGen Blog
Rainwater harvesting: where are the incentives?
Posted by Barry Nutley on 5 March 2010 at 9:06 am
The recent announcements surrounding the feed-in tariff (FIT) and renwable heat incentive (RHI), are (generally) fantastic news for the renewable industry. But the Government seems to have forgotten about rainwater harvesting.
Whilst technically not a renewable technology, water is still an important resource that needs to be preserved. We need it for almost everything we do.
But what do pioneers of RWH get by way of incentives? Unless you are a business user, where you can claim enhanced capital allowances, you get absolutely nothing. No grants, no additional payments. Nothing, other than the satisfaction of preserving, probably, the most valuable commodity around.
But, do you hear these people complain? No. Unlike the pioneers of solar and wind who will miss out on the full FIT payments, but will still get paid an additional sum, on top of the savings and probably obtained a grant to aid installation? (Let me add, at this point, that I do support your cause!). Probably once the RHI payments are confirmed and it becomes common knowledge, there'll be a petition from the solar thermal pioneers too.
This is not intended to be a rant, but an attempt to make people think. I could go into more details about the (poor) financial benefits of rainwater harvesting (RWH) compared to say solar thermal, but I have covered that in previous blogs.
I would welcome your thoughts on this. Should we start a campaign for better financial rewards for RWH pioneers? But ... should it be just about the money? Or should we really be thinking of the environment?
Picture by Tanais Fox
About the author: Barry Nutley is co-founder and director of Viridis Energie Consultants
If you have a question about anything in the above blog, please ask it in the comments section below.
Comments
0 comments - read them below or add one
No Comments.
Leave a comment
You must log in to make a comment. If you haven't already registered, please sign up as a company or an individual, then come back and have your say.
Follow us on Twitter
RT @carolinelucas: RT @wwwfoecouk: End energy profiteering: The rich get richer, the poor get colder | Independent: http://t.co/5GOTFMSh 3 hours ago
@treadinglightly They could have made the point about insulating now much more strongly #itvtonight 3 hours ago
@ploughcroft Oh that explains some of the misinformation #itvtonight - you'd think they'd edit in things like FIT rates 3 hours ago



