Quick Find
Energy Experts
- All users
- Laurence Jones
- Adrian Wright
- Linn Rafferty
- Simon Forsyth
- Tim Pullen
- Howard Johns
- Hugo House
- John Martin
- Matthew Rhodes
- John Barker-Brown
- John Lightfoot
- Barry Nutley
- Chris Rudge
- Gabriel Wondrausch
- Paul Hutchens
- David Hunt
- Graham Eastwick
Other Contributors
Cathy Debenham Gilly JonesGuest Bloggers
Aldous EverardChris RowlandDavid FieldsDuncan McIntoshGordon TraillJames PageJon EdgeLisa HallMatt CodyMax SillarsMike MackmurdieNick RoachRob PalgraveRoger CroftSimon FixterStewart BoyleArchive
Posting rulesRecent Comments
- As installers we were all warned investigations and prosecutions of both in…
comment by rudge-renewables-ex12-4aa
- Hi Paul Sorry for the delay responding. You don't have to use the energy…
comment by Cathy Debenham
- Hello Chris, I have a question about heating water by solar power to r…
comment by Dave Thickett
Tag Cloud
YouGen Blog
Is water the new carbon?
Posted by Barry Nutley on 15 July 2010 at 11:20 am
I've mentioned the importance of water saving in previous blogs, but is it set to become the most talked about environmental issue?
I recently read an article eluding to this:
David Symons, director of consultancy WSP Environment & Energy, before his presentation at IWEX on Wednesday, Is water the next carbon?.
Said, "Arguably in the short term water is more important than carbon.
"But the two are linked. Carbon emissions cause climate change. And one of the most significant impacts of climate change is forecast to be changing rainfall patterns and water availability as a result."
He said that water use sometimes seems to play second fiddle to the energy saving from the public and political perspective for a number of reasons.
Because Britain seen as a wet country, people can find it hard to accept that high population density makes water shortages a real issue.
Also, water is not seen as such a precious commodity as energy as it is comparatively inexpensive, so the commercial drivers as not seen as being so pressing.
And, he added, it is logistically harder to make significant water savings as, unlike with energy, most issues and opportunities arise in the supply chain and/or in downstream use of water by consumers.
Whilst David suggests it's more difficult to make significant savings, I disagree. We know that an installation of a rainwater harvesting "kit", the domestic savings could be up to 50%.
Commercially, it could be higher.
I've mentioned before, that while the Feed In Tariff and Renewable Heat Incentive are great schemes to promote renewable energy. There is very little incentive to save/collect water! Perhaps we should start a campaign for this??
What do you think??
Photo by Kevin Dooley
About the author: Barry Nutley is co-founder and director of Viridis Energie Consultants
If you have a question about anything in the above blog, please ask it in the comments section below.
Comments
0 comments - read them below or add one
No Comments.
Leave a comment
You must log in to make a comment. If you haven't already registered, please sign up as a company or an individual, then come back and have your say.
Follow us on Twitter
Encouraging to hear they may be a bit more money for feed-in tariff in tomorrow's announcement http://t.co/lyycQvAr #FITs 3 hours ago
A big day for the renewables industry tomorrow. Still hopeful that the proposals will be good. 11 hours ago
@websitesahoy It is there, I saw it. 12 hours ago



