Quick Find
Energy Experts
- All users
- Laurence Jones
- Adrian Wright
- Linn Rafferty
- Ross Lammas
- Simon Forsyth
- Tim Pullen
- Howard Johns
- Hugo House
- John Martin
- Matthew Rhodes
- Pete Roberts
- Chris Davis
- John Barker-Brown
- John Lightfoot
- Barry Nutley
- Chris Rudge
- Gabriel Wondrausch
- Paul Hutchens
- David Hunt
- Graham Eastwick
Other Contributors
Cathy Debenham Gilly JonesGuest Bloggers
Aldous EverardAlister ScottChris RowlandDavid FieldsDuncan McIntoshGordon TraillHarvey JonesJames PageJon EdgeLisa HallMatt CodyMax SillarsMerlin HymanMike MackmurdieNick RoachRob PalgraveRoger CroftSimon FixterStewart BoyleArchive
Posting rulesRecent Comments
- Informative commercial website here concerning low energy LED downlighters.…
comment by andytee
- A very interesting post. It is up to everyone in the industry to put out a …
comment by ekland-ltd-ex4-7bd
- A properly designed condensing tumble drier should use the heat from the he…
comment by nigeldodd
Tag Cloud
YouGen Blog
Beware: receiving grants from public funds may make you ineligible for feed-in tariffs
Posted by Cathy Debenham on 18 August 2011 at 8:52 am
The feed-in tariff is intended to replace grants from public funds as the main way of incentivising microgeneration. So anyone awarded a public grant to install or buy generating equipment is in danger of not being eligible for the feed-in tariff (unless they repay the grant).
There are some exemptions:
1. the grant was made before 1 July 2011,
2. the installation is first commissioned before 1 October 2011, and
3. the combination of grants and income from the feed-in tariff is in accordance with the European Community's rules on de minimis aid.
Also exempted are "permitted grants":
These are grants made from public funds made before 1 April 2010 for the cost of buying or installing:
- an eligible installation first commisioned before 15 July 2009; or
- an eligible installation on a residential prperty first commissioned between 15 July 2009 and 31 March 2010; or
In respect of reasonable additional costs of an installation to avoice or mitigate environmental harm. In order to qualify, the amount of the grant must not exceed the amount of those identified costs.
An example of the latter might be, for example, to protect fish and other small wildlife in a micro hydro scheme. It is unlikely that there will be justifiable extra costs for solar PV, wind or micro-CHP installations.
More information is available on the Ofgem website.
Photo by Steve Jurvetson
If you have a question about anything in the above blog, please ask it in the comments section below.
Comments
0 comments - read them below or add one
No Comments.
Leave a comment
You must log in to make a comment. If you haven't already registered, please sign up as a company or an individual, then come back and have your say.
Follow us on Twitter
Looking forward to today's workshop with @parityprojects 2 hours ago
Solar PV remains one of the best investments around say trade bodies http://t.co/dxKDhVXh yesterday
@Kristian_Marr I'm intrigued to know what's involved in being a DECC youth panellist yesterday



