Which type of Christmas tree is best for the environment?
Posted by Sam Tonge on 18 December 2017 at 9:30 am
The YouGen Team are getting into the festive spirit here at the National Energy Foundation as we count down the days until we can put our feet up (and recharge our own personal energy levels) over the holiday period! In the seasonal tradition of giving and receiving, we would like to share with you the typical life cycle of a natural or ‘real’ Christmas tree compared to that of an artificial or ‘fake’ tree.
With over 100 million Christmas trees being sold across Europe and North America each year, we look at the various ways in which we can all make sure that this centre point within our living rooms treads lightly on the planet’s surface throughout its life cycle.
We can start by thinking about where real Christmas trees originate. Cutting down a real tree each year in many cases can be considered as more environmentally-friendly than buying a fake tree. This is because a real tree is grown on plantations over a period of 5-10 years which not only absorbs greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide but also provides habitat for wildlife and contributes to the local economy through employment. It’s also worth bearing in mind that for each Christmas tree cut down, a new one is planted in its place for subsequent years, with a single farmed tree absorbing over one ton of CO2 throughout its lifetime.
In contrast, an artificial tree is likely to be made of PVC, a non-biodegradable plastic derived from petroleum. Older trees can often contain metals such as traces of lead which acts as a stabiliser. This may be surprising to you if you’ve always considered investing in a fake tree as an act of environmental goodwill.
Real Christmas trees are grown in plantations across the UK, meaning their distribution to our homes contributes far less in carbon miles compared to artificial trees, which are often manufactured in far-flung corners of the globe and require international transportation via our airways and oceans. A typical artificial tree can have a carbon footprint of approximately 40kg of greenhouse gas emissions as a result of its transportation. Although you may have to drive a particular distance to your nearest tree plantation, this is considerably smaller in terms of journey time and carbon intensity.
Whilst in your home
Real trees can provide what some describe as a nice feel and an irreplaceable authenticity, with the whole experience of going out, selecting a tree and decorating it a cornerstone of the Christmas experience.
However it’s worth pointing out artificial trees hold a number of advantages when it comes to their use in the home. This includes their sheer convenience and ease of packing, with assembling and dismantling the tree each year achieved through connected parts and ready-made cardboard boxes. Artificial trees are also generally fire resistant and can offer a good bill of health over the festive period to those who would suffer from allergies from real trees. Real trees are renowned for their flammability once they’ve dried out and can also harbour insects as well as being quite a pain to clean up after once the needles begin to fall off.
Either way, remember to use LED lights on your Christmas decorations wherever possible!
Its eventual disposal
The disposal of a Christmas tree is fundamental to determining its environmental sustainability, perhaps even more so than its origin.
A real tree can be replanted if potted correctly and well-maintained throughout the Christmas period. Initial uprooting when you cut down the tree breaks a number of tree roots; however in some cases you may successfully revive the tree by replanting it.
The next best option for real trees is to recycle them for use as wood chips which can be used as fuel for biomass boilers or even as fertiliser. The use of wood chips can be wide-ranging and extends to use in habitat restoration projects or beach-front erosion prevention schemes.
This continued use of waste product through burning or recycling significantly reduces the carbon footprint of a real tree by up to 80%. Compare this to an artificial tree, which is generally not recyclable, meaning its sustainability will be largely determined by how many years you are able to re-use it for. On average, a fake tree will be used for five to seven Christmases, with their eventual disposal meaning they sit within landfill (potentially for hundreds of years).
So there you have it - the typical life cycle of your Christmas tree. With both sides presenting strong cases, it is difficult to find one right answer to which type of tree is the most sustainable. The key to making a decision will rest on what you feel is a priority when decorating your home. Whether it’s the environment, family tradition or just the Christmas feel-good factor, balancing each of these can appear a daunting task. The environmental sustainability does not depend just on the type of tree itself, but also how you use it.
On behalf of everyone here at YouGen, thanks for being a part of our membership community and we would like to wish you all a wonderful Christmas and New Year.
Need help with any Jargon?
About the author:
Sam has contributed to our blog since 2016 and previously worked for the National Energy Foundation.
He became interested in green energy after completing a degree in Geography (BSc) at Royal Holloway, University of London.
Sam is passionate about renewable energy and is committed to spreading the word about the role it plays in delivering environmental sustainability.
If you have a question about anything in the above blog, please ask it in the comments section below.
5 comments - read them below or add one